2DBarcode.info

cost sharing in .NET Drawing Code 39 in .NET cost sharing

cost sharing Using Barcode drawer for .NET Control to generate, create USS Code 39 image in Visual Studio .NET applications. ean 8 there is some .NET framework ANSI/AIM Code 39 S whose recovered cost is at most m + o(m). We start by bounding the expected total cost share using linearity of expectation and cross-monotonicity: ES.

(a, S) = E E a Ai a Ai (a, S) + E j =i (aj , S) . j =i (aj , T ) .. (a, {a} T ) + E Notice that th e set T has a facility location solution of cost 3 + k 1 and thus by the budget-balance condition the second term in the above expression is at most k + 2. The rst term in the above expression can be written as mES,a [ (a, {a} T )], where the expectation is over the random choice of S and the random choice of a from Ai . This is equivalent to the following random experiment: From each Aj , pick an agent aj uniformly at random.

Then pick i from {1, . . .

, k} uniformly at random and let a = ai and T = {aj : j = i}. From this description it is clear 1 that the expected value of (a, {a} T ) is equal to k k =1 (aj , {a1 , . .

. , ak }). j This, by the budget-balance property and the fact that {a1 , .

. . , ak } has a solution of cost k + 3, cannot be more than k+3 .

Therefore, k ES. (a, S) m k+3 k + (k + 2) = m + o(m),. (15.6). when m = (k) Code39 for .NET and k = (1). Therefore, the expected value of the ratio of recovered cost to total cost tends to 1/3.

. 15.6 The Shapley Value and the Nash Bargaining Solution One of the pro Code 3/9 for .NET blems with the notion of core in cost-sharing games is that it rarely assigns a unique cost allocation to a game: as illustrated in Example 15.4, the core of a game is often either empty (making it useless in deciding how the cost of a service should be shared among the agents), or contains more than one point (making it necessary to have a second criterion for choosing a cost allocation).

In this section, we study a solution concept called the Shapley value that assigns a single cost allocation to any given cost-sharing game. We also discuss a solution concept known as the Nash bargaining solution for a somewhat different but related framework for surplus sharing. In both cases, the solution concept can be uniquely characterized in terms of a few natural axioms it satis es.

These theorems are classical examples of the axiomatic approach in economic theory. Both the Shapley value and the Nash bargaining solution are widely applicable concepts. For example, an application of the Shapley value in combination with the Moulin mechanism to multicasting is discussed elsewhere in this book (see Section 14.

2.2). Also, the Nash solution is related to Kelly s notion of proportional fairness discussed in Section 5.

12, and the Eisenberg-Gale convex program of Section 6.2..

the shapley value and the nash bargaining solution 15.6.1 The Shapley Value Consider a cos t-sharing game de ned by the set A of n agents and the cost function c. A simple way of allocating the cost c(A) among all agents is to order the agents in some order, say a1 , a2 , . .

. , an , then proceed in this order and charge each agent the marginal cost of adding her to the serviced set. In other words, the rst agent a1 will be charged her stand-alone cost c({a1 }), the second agent a2 will be charged c({a1 , a2 }) c({a1 }), and so on.

This method is called an incremental cost sharing. A problem with the method described above is that it is not anonymous, i.e.

, the ordering of the agents makes a difference in the amount they will be charged. The Shapley value xes this problem by taking a random ordering of the agents picked uniformly from the set of all n! possible orderings, and charging each agent her expected marginal cost in this ordering. Since for any agent i A and any set S A \ {i} with .

S. = s, the prob ability that the set of agents that come before i in a random ordering is precisely S is s!(n 1 s)!/n!, the Shapley value can be de ned by the following formula:. For each agent i,. i (c) =.
Copyright © 2DBarcode.info . All rights reserved.